Monday, April 29, 2013

String Quartet #1


String Quartet #1
雪

This is a short five movement piece for string quartet. Each movement is only about one minute each. And each movement is one line of a tanka that I wrote about Snow (Yuki). I wrote the second movement first and all of the material in the other four movements appears in or is derived from the second movement. Given this, one can think of the first movement as a prelude with the second movement being the main movement. The fifth movement re-states the main motifs of the first four movements, combining them into one large polyphonic mass.

Unable to sleep
I listen throughout the night
to the silent song
of falling snow in my yard.
With the soft dawn, satori.


  • The first movement is built around the pentatonic scale F# G B C# D. (The Japanese Hirajoshi Scale )
  • The second movement is built around the pentatonic scale C# D F# G# A.
  • The third movement is built around the pentatonic scale D Eb G A Bb.
  • The fourth movement is built around the pentatonic scale C Dd F G Ab
  • The fifth movement is built around the pentatonic scale C# D F# G# A

MP3 at: http://www.scoreexchange.com/scores/22295.html


Thursday, April 25, 2013

Sakura


Sakura
falling in the breeze.
Life goes on


Thursday, April 18, 2013

Haiku of the week

   
Like the morning dew
Under the harsh light of day
Your lies fade away.

   

Friday, April 12, 2013

Dancing Up the Morning Sun


A  Serendipitous Experiment in Sound


Not sure if this works or how it works. 

No score for it since the score would make no sense.

Just an Atonal ("atonal" as it only uses unpitch percussion and sounds) experiment in sound and rhythm.  

Friday, March 08, 2013

Tanka of the day


  
Crisp spring rain
snow on the mountains
bright sunlight

bills I have to pay
to work I must go
  

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Haiku of the week


   
Listen to
naught but emptiness
and silence.  
   

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Inner Flow


Inner Flow

A nine minute Jazz : Ambient: Meditation in 27/8 time.

MP3 and Score at: Inner Flow (Score & MP3)

MP3 only: Inner Flow (MP3)


Thursday, October 04, 2012

J-Pop queued on the player



Sitting on the beach
am I becoming
a melancholy
Renaissance painter
Sipping Corn N' Oil

  
   
Surreal poem of the day

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Standing in the rain


夜行と雨

      

Standing in the rain 
tiny cold tears of heaven 
kissing her dark hair
   
   

Friday, September 14, 2012

EOUS a bit of "free jazz".


Eous

As a composer I occasionally get a musical idea stuck in my craw that I can not shake out of my ears until I get it down on paper and published; "Eous"(1) is one such piece.

"Eous" is a piece for a Jazz group consisting of Soprano Sax, Vibraphone, Bass and Drums. Please take a listen to the MP3 for an example of one way the piece could be interpreted. Thank you.



   
(1) "Eous" is a made up word with no meaning.

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Taulma V


Taulma is a made up word, but sounds a bit like the name of a planet in a SciFi novel.

Music by me, and a bit different than my usual stuff.

Taulma V



Thursday, August 09, 2012

Does 5/8 = 5/4 = 5/2 ? The Definitive Guide.

Does 5/8 = 5/4 = 5/2 ? The Definitive Guide.

Not! First let me state that this is in no way a definitive, nor even an authoritative statement on the differences between 5/8 and 5/4, they are my interpenetration of the differences and my use of them in my compositions.

On the surface one can say that they are mathematically equivalent. By this we mean that by setting the eight note in 5/8 time and the quarter note in 5/4 time to the same BPM (metronome mark) both bars would move through time at the same rate. Thus one could argue that they are equivalent and that there no real difference between them. But ask your self this is a there a difference between 6/8 and ¾ time? We can set their eight note BPM to the same value, and both bars would move through time at the same rate; but would they have the same feel? How about 6/8 and 6/4 ?

Part of the issue is how do we define rhythm?

So what is the difference (from my perspective)? It is one of “pulse”. In 5/4 time one would “feel” five pulses in the bar, no matter the BPM. In 4/4 time one feels four pulses in each bar. (I feel a lot of 4/4 music might be better notated as 2/2, but that is another discussion.) In 5/4 there might be an emphasis on particular pulses (beats), but there would be five even beats to the bar. In 4/4 there are 4/4 even pules (beats) to the bar with perhaps (given the gene of music) bit more emphasis on the first and third beats, or as some have explained; a pattern of a Strong, Weak, Strong, Weak emphasis in the bar with the third beat a little less strong than the first beat. In 5/4 time we might have a pattern of Strong, Weak, Weak, (Less) Strong, Weak.

So let us go back and examine 6/8, ¾ and 2/4. In 6/8 and ¾ we have the same number of eight notes but one is “felt” in two and one is felt in three. In 6/8 time one has two even “pulses”, where the ¾ time has three pulses. [Yes at extreme tempos, the ¾ could turn into more of a single pulse]. Are you familiar with Bernstein's “America” from West Side story? It is in alternating 6/8 and ¾ bars. The “tempo” of the eight notes remain constant, but the pulse, or beat, changes from one bar to another. So what is the difference between 6/8 and 2/4? They both are felt in two, but one has a base sub-division of three eight note and one has a basic sub-division of two notes. But in both the pulse remains constant.

Now onto 5/8 (and by extension 7/8, 9/8 divided asymmetrically, 11/8, 13/8, 14/8, et cetera). My approach to 5/8 is that (when divided 3+2 or 2+3) it has TWO pulses or beats per bar. But unlike 6/8 or 2/4 that also have two pulses per bar, the two pulses in 5/8 are uneven in length; asymmetrical! In a 3+2 division the first pulse of the bar would be 50 percent longer than the second pulse. If you where to tap your toes to the pulse in 5/8 the tapping would be asymmetrical, Does 5/8 = 5/4 = 5/2 ? The Definitive Guide.

Not! First let me state that this is in no way a definitive, nor even an authoritative statement on the differences between 5/8 and 5/4, they are my interpenetration of the differences and my use of them in my compositions.

On the surface one can say that they are mathematically equivalent. By this we mean that by setting the eight note in 5/8 time and the quarter note in 5/4 time to the same BPM (metronome mark) both bars would move through time at the same rate. Thus one could argue that they are equivalent and that there no real difference between them. But ask your self this is a there a difference between 6/8 and ¾ time? We can set their eight note BPM to the same value, and both bars would move through time at the same rate; but would they have the same feel? How about 6/8 and 6/4 ?

Part of the issue is how do we define rhythm?

So what is the difference (from my perspective)? It is one of “pulse”. In 5/4 time one would “feel” five pulses in the bar, no matter the BPM. In 4/4 time one feels four pulses in each bar. (I feel a lot of 4/4 music might be better notated as 2/2, but that is another discussion.) In 5/4 there might be an emphasis on particular pulses (beats), but there would be five even beats to the bar. In 4/4 there are 4/4 even pules (beats) to the bar with perhaps (given the gene of music) bit more emphasis on the first and third beats, or as some have explained; a pattern of a Strong, Weak, Strong, Weak emphasis in the bar with the third beat a little less strong than the first beat. In 5/4 time we might have a pattern of Strong, Weak, Weak, (Less) Strong, Weak.

So let us go back and examine 6/8, ¾ and 2/4. In 6/8 and ¾ we have the same number of eight notes but one is “felt” in two and one is felt in three. In 6/8 time one has two even “pulses”, where the ¾ time has three pulses. [Yes at extreme tempos, the ¾ could turn into more of a single pulse]. Are you familiar with Bernstein's “America” from West Side story? It is in alternating 6/8 and ¾ bars. The “tempo” of the eight notes remain constant, but the pulse, or beat, changes from one bar to another. So what is the difference between 6/8 and 2/4? They both are felt in two, but one has a base sub-division of three eight note and one has a basic sub-division of two notes. But in both the pulse remains constant.

Now onto 5/8 (and by extension 7/8, 9/8 divided asymmetrically, 11/8, 13/8, 14/8, et cetera). My approach to 5/8 is that (when divided 3+2 or 2+3) it has TWO pulses or beats per bar. But unlike 6/8 or 2/4 that also have two pulses per bar, the two pulses in 5/8 are uneven in length; asymmetrical! In a 3+2 division the first pulse of the bar would be 50 percent longer than the second pulse. If you where to tap your toes to the pulse in 5/8 the tapping would be asymmetrical, uneven, but not random. The underlying eight note “rate” (temp) would remain constant, but the pulse would fluctuate (in a precise manner). In 5/4 time the pulse would remain “constant”; id est two eight notes for every beat/pulse. 10/8 time and 5/4 time that both had the same BPM would be mathematically equivalent, but each would be felt differently. In 10/8 time we would normally have four (un-even) pulses to the bar (3+3+2+2 for example) where in 5/4 we would have five even pulses (2+2+2+2+2). 7/8 time would have three pulses, 9/8 (divided 2+2+2+3) would have four pulses, 11/8 (3+3+3+2) would be four pulses (Don Ellis once called it 3 and 2/3 time). Et cetra.

At extreme tempos these feelings of pulse can break down or blur, and I am sure there are examples in the literature that do not follow these guild-lines; as I stated this is my working model on the use of 5/8 vs 5/4 in my music.

Questions?


Ursus Demens